Note update.

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/notes/260826-use-alloc.md b/notes/260826-use-alloc.md
index e72b006..20d53c7 100644
--- a/notes/260826-use-alloc.md
+++ b/notes/260826-use-alloc.md
@@ -109,6 +109,15 @@ alignment padding, but that'll be relatively small as well if you do
 the calculations, I'm pretty sure.  In any case, no worse than other
 general-purpose allocators, I'm pretty sure.
 
+*Update:* Just realized that for SIMD related reasons, it would be
+best to force 16-byte alignment much earlier, and probably 32-byte
+too.  Also, the 64-byte alignment doesn't add any value since the
+maximum object size dominates the maximum bit count for bitmaps;
+therefore, the alignment values should simply go: 8, 16, 32, ...
+without any alignment higher than 32.  This has practically no
+relevance to the strategies in the rest of this article; higher
+alignments don't prevent any of the discussed designs.
+
 
 ## Occupancy bitmaps